Raemistrasse 100 Zurich, Zurich (Switzerland)
Destouchesstr. 1 Munchen, Bayern (Germany)
162 City Road London, Greater London (UK)
Flinders Drive, Bedford Park South Australia (Australia)
The results published in the New England Journal of Medicine counter an argument from some in the medical community that ICUs need roundtheclock intensivists doctors who specialize in critical care
quotOur knee jerk reaction is to try to put intensivists in every ICU at all hours of the day and that reaction is likely a misstep because it oversimplifies the issuequot said Dr Jeremy Kahn senior author of the study and a professor at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
Most research has shown that having an intensivist in an ICU during the day improves the chances that patients will survive said Kahn
quotTheres been this movement to say well we need to be there at night tooquot said Dr Allan Garland a professor at the University of Manitoba in Winnipeg Canada who was not involved in the study quotBut what there hasnt been is much dataquot
Data are important when it comes to staffing ICUs considering there are not enough intensivists to go around and they are a much more expensive staff member than say a nurse
Kahn said just half of all ICUs in the United States have access to a critical care specialist
And several earlier studies on the impact of nighttime intensivists have had mixed results
To try to get a clearer picture of how much they help patients survive Kahns group examined a larger group of ICUs
They collected information from 49 ICUs across the US covering more than 65000 patients
Twelve of the ICUs had an intensivist on staff at night while the other 37 did not
About 13 out of every 100 patients in the ICUs died within the hospital or went from the ICU to hospice care regardless of whether there was an intensivist available at night or not
But when the researchers divided the ICUs into two categories those that had intensivists overseeing patient care during the day and those that did not Kahns group got a different answer
Among the 22 ICUs with no intensivist during the day having one at night was tied to a 38 percent lower patient death rate than in ICUs without a day or nighttime intensivist
quotThe results of this large study seem to support previously observed associations between overall higher intensity staffing and lower mortalityquot said Dr Ognjen Gajic a professor at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester MN who did not participate in this research
Not all studies have agreed on this association Gajic added in an email to Reuters Health
Despite the new reports finding that a nighttime intensivist makes a difference if theres none during the day the converse was not true Among ICUs with an intensivist during the day the percentage of patients who died within the hospital was the same regardless of whether an intensivist was also present at night
Kahn said the findings suggest that the good intensivists do during the day carries over into the night
Its not so much that the benefits are coming from emergency lifesaving procedures in the wee hours he explained
Rather the difference intensivists make comes from quotmuch more routine banal systematic things like high quality preventive medicine ventilator management and most of these things can be done effectively during the day And once youve implemented all the evidencedbased practices during the day then what you do at night has little impactquot said Kahn
Gajic said its possible the ICUs that have intensivists on staff during the day might also have access to those doctors at night because they are on call
But without knowing the particular arrangements at each hospital its unclear why ICUs with daytime intensivists dont benefit from having them at night he said
Garland said theres a need for more research on different staffing scenarios
quotOne of the things that we would like to see is a consensus Youre much more confident of a result when youve had different studiesall give you the same answer I think its fair to say that we dont yet have that with respect to how intensivists should be involved in ICUsquot Garland told Reuters Health
Kahn said there might be legitimate reasons to have a nighttime specialist in the ICU such as for training purposes
But to improve the chances that patients will leave the ICU alive it doesnt appear that every ICU needs an intensivist at all hours
quotFor ICUs that have very robust daytime staffing they should seriously reexamine the reasons that theyre moving towards 24hour intensivists because it appears that theres little if any marginal gain in survival and those resources may be better deployed in other hospitalsquot Kahn told Reuters Health
Date : 22 May, 2012
Reference : uk.reuters.com/article/2012/05/21/us-icus-specialist-idUKBRE84K13O20120521